arXiv Accepts OOXML!? February 28, 2008Posted by gordonwatts in computers.
This just floored me. Dave mentioned this in a comment in one of my last posts. It looks like the major pre-print archive accepts the OOXML format now. I thought they only accepted PDF and .tex submissions.
This makes be beg the question (though it might not do it to you), but is there a tex2ooXML converter (some found here, but one or two I tried didn’t seem to work)? Hear me out before you write me off as crazy (as I think some of you already have). The reason that interests me is that PDF is a static page format. I now read almost all my papers on a screen. The size of the screen and its resolution rarely match with letter. For example, my last laptop purchase was delayed 6 months because I needed a high resolution screen so I can read my PDF’s full screen when it was rotated on its side – in tablet mode. The increased screen resolution, btw, makes PDF’s look a lot better – especially when the computer modern font is used (sorry, couldn’t resist that dig).
What I’d love is to be able to re-flow the documents on the fly to adjust to the screen size. Now, what I could do is run latex in the background. The upside is that no format translation is required and TeX is certainly up to the task. The downside is that automation of this isn’t trivial – some programing work would be required (column sizes, screen sizes and resolutions, font rasterization?). On the other hand, Word will do re-flow and columns automatically, as well as resizing fonts. The downside is you would loose fidelity in the translation.
The place this I’m particularly interested in this is these new MID devices – slow CPU’s and relatively low resolution (and small screen sizes). They have relatively weak CPUs. I’ve seen Word reflow documents on these devices – it performs ok on a 100 page document (not ideal). I have no idea how long it would take to regenerate a 20 page latex paper (which would then be 100 pages or something). Would it be fast enough to be usable?