jump to navigation

The New Yorker on the LHC May 12, 2007

Posted by gordonwatts in physics, physics life.
trackback

The New Yorker has a nice (long – duh!) bit on the LHC. It includes this classic line near the start:

The place was so crowded that it took me five minutes to pay for a cup of coffee, proving the elemental truth that man can build a superconducting collider but not a functional cafeteria.

The spend a bit too much time addressing how the LHC might (or might not) destroy the earth as we know it, but at least bring it to a slightly humorous conclusion.

There is also this quote from Arkani-Hamed (a theorist at Harvard), which I do not think I need to comment on.🙂

It’s a general fact about physics that the people you tend to remember are the theorists,” he went on. “At least in the mythology, experiment plays a less central role. And there’s a natural reason for that, because the ultimate goal isn’t to observe things about nature; the ultimate goal is to understand and explain things about nature. So, for that reason, it’s a chicken-and-egg problem. But definitely you want to be the chicken.”

(the previous paragraph is worth reading too). All-in-all, a good read.

Comments»

1. sparklecow - May 12, 2007

ever ride your bike around the accelerator?

2. gordonwatts - May 12, 2007

Never.

Marseille is great…

3. Kevin - May 20, 2007

http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2007/05/12/scientists_hope_collider_makes_a_big_bang/

this actually made the front page of the Boston Globe – and quotes people that I work with . Just one degree of separation from making front page news…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: