jump to navigation

Right Way to Be Crazy February 28, 2006

Posted by gordonwatts in physics.
trackback

A while ago I complained about cold fusion and how it was covered in a Make Magazine article. The author of the article seemed to be saying that this fellow was right and all of science was wrong. I had no problem with that, but nothing is to be believed until it is independently verified; and the author should take that view as well.

The latest Make (thanks to my sister for getting me the subscription!) has an interview with a fellow from Seattle, Woody Norris. It ends with the following (spelling & grammar are my mistakes):

Rumor has it that you are working on some inventions that involve gravity. Anything you can share?

I am fortunate that I am now in a financial position that allows me to pursue big problems. So for the last several years, I have tried to deliberately invent over my head. When I can’t get the answers I need for the problems I’m working on, I find professors who specialize in the areas that I am working on and then pay them to conduct the research or write me papers. This allows me to get experts in niche areas to evaluate my ideas and tell me if they are smart or stupid.

So with that context, let me say that nobody really understands gravity. What we do know is that is has something to do with mass, and it is the result of something going on in the nucleus of the atom. I think I know what that “something” is. I might be the only person in the world who knows what that “something” is. I know that sounds brazen, but I believe it’s true. I have been working on a variety of experiments, over the course of years, to test my theory in a way that yields clear, unambiguous results so that it can be independently reproduced — I don’t want a Pons and Fleischmann situation.

Based on the current rate of progress, I am confident that within ten years we will understand the mechanism of gravity and be able to influence its in specific ways. I realize that most scientists reading this will think I am nuts, but I am no risking anybody’s money or reputation but my own. So if I am wrong, no big deal. If I am right, the rewards for everyone will be terrific.

Now, that is the right approach. Crazy idea? Outside the mainstream scientist (i.e. you probably can’t get peer-reviewed funding for it)? Probably. If I heard his idea would I think it was crazy? Probably? Should he follow it up? Sure! And he has the right yard stick for success: it can be independently reproduced. If you want to do something off the beaten track — those five words are what will make you famous (and rich). I wish him best of luck!

Comments»

1. Ponderer - February 28, 2006

this Norris guy has quite some ego. Based on his ramblings alone and without knowing specifics of his brilliant “theory” I strongly suspect he is a crackpot. Not that this should (or ever did in the past) stop anyone from doing science.

2. Ed Minchau - March 1, 2006

“without knowing specifics of his brilliant “theory” I strongly suspect he is a crackpot”

Ponderer, your suspicions of his crackpottery are irrelevant, but the specifics of his theory are most definitely relevant – particularly if the results can be independently reproduced. If they can be independently reproduced, then he’s right, whether he’s a crackpot or not.

3. gordonwatts - March 1, 2006

And it wouldn’t be the first time a crack-pot has upset all of science. But the point I was trying to make was that, unlike the previous article in Make, this guy wasn’t complaining that no one was listening to him. He sounds ready to sacrifice himself at the alter of reproducibility (it’s a religion!!) and that is the way to go, crack pot or mainstream scientist. As I said, I wish him luck!

4. mostly harmless - March 3, 2006

I think the man is soon to be assassinated by secret agents (sent by oil companies, car companies, airline companies and diet companies).

5. alok - January 12, 2007

Whatever or whoever does it ,but technology today is in urgent need to have complete understanding about gravity.
And i agree with the author that we do not yet understand what gtravity is all about.
(the url given by me is irrelevant)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: