jump to navigation

J-mo runs an ATLAS meeting May 30, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in life, physics life.
add a comment

I’ve attended plenty of meetings with Julia in the past. These are all video or phone meetings. Sometimes she gets very activated (especially when it is video) and starts yammering “blah blah blah” – I think she thinks that what we are saying (she doesn’t know how close she is sometimes! :-) ). Most of the time I can mute the microphone… Most of the time…

But the other night was the first time I tried to run a meeting and take care of Julia at the same time. About 50% of the time she went quietly and played by herself in the other room. The other 50% of the time she was competing with me for control of the keyboard. I’m not sure how well the minutes are going to come out. :-)

Watch This Space… May 29, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in physics.
5 comments

Here. Future of the US Particle Physics program (at least Fermilab) should be up there soon. Very soon. It is the P5 report. Will the Tevatron run to 2010? What about the next project after the Tevatron? And how many of us keep clicking on that page waiting for the update? Will they not share it and we will be left to hear reports of people that were actually there?

- Gordon (on the outside trying to look in) Watts. :-)

Oil Strike May 29, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in Marseille, politics.
2 comments

There were long lines at the gas stations the other day. Turns out the local french fishermen are blocking the oil tankers from entering the harbor and unloading the oil – so people started to get afraid there wouldn’t be enough gas.

The strike is over the price of fuel for the fisher boats.

When I first heard this I thought it was a bit odd. In general, Europe hasn’t noticed the run-up in the cost of gas the way the USA has. Two reasons — first, the euro is not weak so the purchasing power of the dollar hasn’t changed much. Second is that gas over here is very heavily taxed – much more so than the USA – which means a doubling in the cost of oil (or whatever) translates into a smaller add on to the cost of the gas.

it turns out, however, that fishermen get a tax break. Basically, I’m told, no taxes at all. So when the raw cost of diesel fuel doubles, which apparently it has, people like the fishermen feel it directly. In France, the answer is a strike. They are demanding the government pay the different.

Wow! I said. No way, right!? Way, my friends assured me. In fact, the government had already agreed, but apparently wanted to pay more than the EU would allow them and so some high level negotiations were on going. And the fishermen were trying to keep the pressure up.

This would never happen in America, right? I mean, look at the farm industry, they… oh, wait. Never mind.

N.B.: Gas is currently 1.5 euros here in France. That makes it 6 euros per gallon, and at the current exchange rate of about $1.5/euro, about 9 dollars per gallon. It is no wonder the place is filled with people driving around on scooters!!

Giving a Good Talk May 28, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in Conference, physics life.
7 comments

I watched a practice talk for Top 2008 the other day. The person giving it did a great job. They were way more prepared than I usually am by time I usually give a talk. Unfortunately (or fortunately) there is a lot more to giving a good talk than just a good deck of slides. I think the number one thing for me is “tell a story.”

I started searching the web for other advice out there — there is a lot… Some of it I had never considered before.

  • FONT SIZE. Ok, this one I and I hope everyone else knows well. But feel the need to repeat it because I see so many people doing it. And I’m getting old – so this is becoming more and more important to me! :-) While small fonts show up very well on your screen, they are horrible in a talk – no one in the back of the room can read them!
  • Colors. Ok, this is another one. If you have a white background, don’t use yellow text. Similar advice for dark backgrounds. Contrast on your screen makes this sort of thing look great. Not true for projectors — they are horrible low-contrast things. If you even have to think “Hmmm, I wonder if that color will show up well?” then it probably won’t. Kill it. :-)
  • Use Pictures, not not needlessly. There is plenty of stupid clip-art in the world. If used correctly, it can be funny. The problem is that it is rarely part of the story you are trying to tell – you just put it in to have some fun. Works once. Perhaps twice. On the other hand, don’t fill your slides with text! Dense text is really hard to read. Plots, diagrams – all of these help a lot. Yes, they take longer to put together than just writing some straight text. Tough. :-)
  • Similar, except more sparing, advice about animation, with a caveat. We really don’t use it in particle physics talks. That is ok — it is very hard to use correctly. The same with pictures: if you are going to use it, then make sure it is telling a story. Perhaps my best use of animation is the decay of a bottom quark. First the hard scatter, then the B hadron, then the hadron’s decay tracks, and finally construction lines. This animation shows how the decay unravels – so it is part of the story. I would call that “good.” The other thing about animation: make sure you don’t have to wait for it. Now, that said, everyone in particle physics likes PDFs – which don’t do animation in the sophisticated way that the various presentation programs do. So, make sure when your animation is done that nothing important has been obscured (I’ve violated this so many times. :( ).
  • When you walk around, people will follow you. When you stand still, people will look at your slides. Obvious when you think about it, but I guess I never had. You could use this to your advantage, however. Got an important plot? Stand still as you laser it. Lots of text where you are basically saying what is already up there? Take that opportunity to turn and directly engage your audience and walk around.
  • Use a remote slide advancer if you can. Otherwise you are tied to the length of the cable that attaches the computer to the projector. Another bit of advice I saw out there — don’t use those advancers that have a combined laser pointer. You’ll advance your slides accidentally too many times. Ha! I’ve done that multiple times.
  • Sound like you care. I know you do. Usually we are talking about things that we’ve done — spent months and months or perhaps years perfecting. Or nursing to the point it is a published PRL. Hopefully that will come out in your talk!
  • Finally, the old perennial: don’t say “Ummm…” unless it is part of a joke!

I’m sure people have 1000’s of other bits of advice. Pile on!

Baby Magazines are a Little Different in France May 27, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in France, life.
1 comment so far

IMG_2233Our nounou gets lots of baby magazines – occupational spam, I guess. She gives us an assortment. This one has a whole article on how to have sex when you are pregnant. With rather explicit cartoons (the least of the NSFW I uploaded here).

Blogs of US Folks working on LHC May 26, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in Blogroll, blog, physics.
add a comment

I’m a little slow picking this up — my apologies. If you want to check out more about down-in-the-dirt people working on the LHC start up check out this group blog site. The blogs there

I should update my blogroll – it has little resemblance to the list of blogs I now read in my RSS feeder. Why can’t the two automatically communicate? :-)

We Do Use IM in ATLAS and D0! May 23, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in computers, physics life.
1 comment so far

So, as an experiment, I turned on the little bit of toast that pops up on my desktop each time email arrives. The toast contains the subject line, and the first one or two lines of the email. I usually leave this off as I get email often enough I’d never get any work done I’d be so distracted by the torrent.

And I now realize we do use IM in ATLAS and D0. Just instead of this new fangled interface, we use our email as the interface. Lots of the emails are one line long – “did you try x” or “was is the Y environment variable set to?”

So you could never move this to be a general IM list or chat room. I suppose what you’d want is a community you could come to with “I’m trying to solve X” and then one person would say “Hey — I know a bunch about X – lets talk” – and then the chat occurs out of the sight of everyone else. Of course, the conversation is recorded (i.e. the solution is recorded) so that next time someone asks a question the first thing that happens is a robot responds with “Hey — these questions were asked in the past – they may answer it for you” or something like that.

Ok. That is the best I can do. I guess that is using IM as a help desk – a way to replace mailing lists.

New Level 3 Lesson May 22, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in D0, Trigger, computers.
add a comment

Ok, here is a dumb lesson I’ve learned the hard way. And thanks to many others who helped resolve it. Lets say you design a distributed system – like your online and trigger and data collection system at D0. This is a medium sized system — perhaps 500 boxes and several 1000 CPU’s at this point. It is key to note that this is a heterogeneous system — many of those boxes are doing different things and have to be custom configured.

Now, since it is heterogeneous, but a distributed system, and all the boxes have to communicate with each other, they have to have a way of finding each other. You definitely can’t use raw DNS and the machine name. Computers change. Sometimes you want to do a hot-swap to an experimental system. Your DNS is managed by a central facility so the turn-around can be a day – and when the accelerator is delivery beam you need less than an hour.

So you have to decide on some sort of name service. Some service that can take a name and reply with a machine. If it is done right, this will disappear into the infrastructure and you’ll not even be aware it is there after a few years.

Ops!

Lets see, we’ve been running since 2001. In about 2003 we started using what the “sanctioned” name server for our Level 3 Trigger and DAQ part of the system. Of course, you have to make sure you know where that name server is for all this to work. We had an alias in DNS for that purpose.

And it turns out that our stuff is one of the few things left using that nameserver. Everyone else loads a python file on the command line. I’d originally designed our system so that you could change the location of a system on the fly without having to reboot one of the components – so the python approach was never considered. And the online system recently cleared out a bunch of machines.

The name server was moved. And that alias? Well, everyone forgot and so it wasn’t established. And then slowly, over time, parts of Level 3 started to fail. Thank goodness it was the monitoring code that failed first. But there were several hours of panic. All of us had forgotten how the system works it has been so long.

Maintaining the same system running for years is so weird. Almost all the code I write I think “Ok — get it running, debugged, and check it in and move on.” Keeping some of it running for years, however, there are other considerations. I bet there are whole books on this. Too bad we HEP people never take the time to read that sort of thing before we do our software development…

The Social Network Site is Dead. Long Live The Social Network. May 21, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in computers, physics life.
add a comment

One of the nice things about the long commute between home and the lab here in Marseille is I get to listen to podcasts. One of my favorite for keeping up on things happening in the USA and in politics is the Diane Rehm show (check out the fascinating one on Lebanon).

They devoted almost an hour to Social Networking as well. Parts of the show were little more than an unpaid advertisement for Ning, but there were several nuggets. I shared Rhem’s pain as she asked several times “what is the difference between this and email?” — she did get something out of her guests. But my favorite comment was the one at the end – where one of the guests mentioned that sites like Facebook are of limited lifetime. Soon every web site will be part of the social network. In short, everyone will contribute. In the sort of world I can see many more opportunities for particle physics and making social networking useful for that, rather than having to have a “destination” social network dedicated to particle physics. I look forward to that.

My (Experiment) Social Network May 20, 2008

Posted by gordonwatts in computers, physics life.
add a comment

I am a member of two online, work related, social networks. At least, if you apply a broad definition to social network. They are the collective mailing lists and message boards of the D0 experiment and the ATLAS experiment.

Lets play a thought experiment. Lets say we killed all the mailing lists and the message boards and put everyone on a facebook or Ning-like social network. Would I and the rest of the experiment do any better?

Lets see. If I wanted to know when a new version of the offline software came out I could subscribe to the offline software’s profile. There would be site hosted discussion boards that where people would ask how to get pathena to work. I could post a little message “Working on the @*36@ T/P separation for tagging” as a status. Or perhaps “In the Jet Resolution meeting” or something like that.

But where is the extra value? Now that all this data is in one place (and lets pretend you have some sort of API that you can use to access it) what would you do differently? How would value get added to it? And I mean different than what we currently do with email?

I’m sure it could be done better. I just don’t have a good enough idea of how this works to see what we’d do that would make us work better.

Of course, many of these things would have to be automated (like notification that a new release has been built) – perhaps you’d send email to the social networking site? How ironic would that be??